🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.