🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the right medical coverage for companies – or for our families – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It's Costly

According to recent research, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently the government is shut down because political disagreements regarding tax credits that experts say will lead to premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. How medical professionals get paid would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee earning moderate income pays approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer pays about 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you contrast that with what average US resident spends. I know multiple businesses that are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that with inclusive programs, these contributions also cover pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to supporting medical services. When you add these expenses compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

In the US, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. And, like many our government's defense, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would make management much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than going through the complicated (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complications of current options. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' health histories for weighing risks and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that government play important functions in our lives, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ the majority of American employees and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible employees to enjoy better health, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Are there numerous factors I haven't covered? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes required, would remain a superior and less expensive approach both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

As Americans, we need to reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality globally, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect in this current situation could be that we take serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.