🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions regarding the comments delivered by the sports network commentator Chris Fowler after the Serbian champion's victory over Taylor Fritz in the New York major last eight. Look – the athlete represents the United States, the commentator is from the US – and sports often lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. A little bit of disappointment was appropriate. Rather, he brought up the ongoing absence of US male players at grand slam tournaments: not one of them had lifted a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

We all love a storyline, myself included. But really. Even if Fritz defeated Djokovic for the initial occasion, force of nature the Spanish star was looming in the following match, whom he has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And if he’d somehow gotten past that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, against whom the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the previous seven major titles (and Alcaraz proceeded to thrash a fatigued Serbian in the next round). Fritz stated in post-match interviews following his defeat that he in fact liked his path, because it presented the opportunity to beat the three best competitors in the world in succession. Fritz is more than justified to aim for the accomplishment; an athlete is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Serbian last eight match what other person in their right mind had the lack of American champions on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

The American, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the global rankings starting the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has won his previous six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. It's likely he might claim that position for himself in the coming years. But evidently that at present, that is as far as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a vast gap of performance metrics away. Fritz’s elite serve and concussive power on both forehand and backhand are more than enough to dispose of most opponents on the professional circuit. Against the handful of generational talents, though, Fritz is frequently helpless. The past few years has seen the interesting emergence of tall, gangly players who can nevertheless move around with the alarming speed and fluidity of much shorter men. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His movement is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he seldom win a rally that the other player was dictating, and playing a soft shot versus him is usually a reliable tactic. That acts as a quite harsh limitation on his potential.

The American has made a number of significant, unexpected improvements over the years. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the bottom of the world's best thirty. 24 months later, he was approaching the top 10. Last year, he suddenly surged to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and including a aging Serbian, is the highest of all. What was the commentator have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the continuing slump of US male players winning major titles when he had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the appreciation for the difficulty of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best advancement to the All England Club semi-finals in the summer.

The American's performance in that very quarter-final ought to have been sufficient of an indication. Djokovic won in four rounds, a win that only felt uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a couple match points and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The pair appeared well-balanced during the exchanges, with the American earning numerous chances to break. But Djokovic saved service break opportunity after service break opportunity, extending the run to the point of frustration. When Fritz eventually did convert one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly produced a terrible service game to drop serve once more; the Serbian had lulled him into a battle peripheral to the main contest and forced him to use excessive effort to prevail. Facing match points in the final game, Fritz’s first serve floated to the sky. He prolonged the contest twice on his second serve, but ultimately committed two errors. It wasn’t a choke, I didn’t think, only a result of needing to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The match was fairly ironclad evidence that Fritz is not good enough to beat any version of the Serbian, that lost to Alcaraz in the next round and never particularly appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly fine – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has developed enough experience and tactical know-how to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were anticipating Fritz to win, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was had not accomplished anything that indicated he could.

The American is an asset to the circuit regardless. He’s a calm, thoughtful presence in press conferences, more so than virtually anyone on the men's tour aside from the Russian star, willing to not only say his emotions or the strategy he felt decided a match, but explain it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the responsibility for the United States not spawn a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Now that the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, maybe they can divide that load.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Group

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably think about it forever if I fail to accomplish it,” Fritz informed a journalist in June of winning a major. I hope he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t fulfill that goal, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is actually extremely improbable for all other players. {